Perhaps one of the
best ways to understand the compacting process is to examine four
case studies of students whose curriculum has been compacted. The
paragraphs below provide an overview of the compacting process completed
for Rosa, Eileen, Brad, and David.
Rosa's Compactor. (Click on the
figure to see it as a PDF file.)
Rosa Rosa
is a fifth grader in a self-contained heterogeneous classroom; her
school is located in a lower socio-economic urban school district.
While Rosa's reading and language scores range between four or five
years above grade level, most of her 29 classmates are reading one
to two years below grade level. This presented Rosa's teacher with
a common problem: what was the best way to instruct Rosa? He agreed
to compact her curriculum. Taking the easiest approach possible,
he administered all of the appropriate unit tests for the grade
level in the Basal Language Arts program, and excused Rosa from
completing the activities and worksheets in the units where she
showed proficiency (80% and above). When Rosa missed one or two
questions, the teacher checked for trends in those items and provided
instruction and practice materials to ensure concept mastery.
Rosa usually took part in language arts lessons
one or two days a week; the balance of the time she spent with alternative
projects, some of which she selected. This strategy spared Rosa
up to six or eight hours a week with language arts skills that were
simply beneath her level. She joined the class instruction only
when her pretests indicated she had not fully acquired the skills
or to take part in a discussion that her teacher thought she would
enjoy. In the time saved through compacting, Rosa engaged in a number
of enrichment activities. First, she spent as many as five hours
a week in a resource room for high ability students. This time was
usually scheduled during her language arts class, benefiting both
Rosa and her teacher, since he did not have to search for all of
the enrichment options himself. The best part of the process for
Rosa was she did not have make-up regular classroom assignments
because she was not missing essential work. She became the editor
of the school newspaper.
Rosa also visited a regional science center
with other students who had expressed a high interest and aptitude
for science. Science was a second strength area for Rosa, and based
on the results of her Interest-A-Lyzer,
(a questionnaire students complete to help assess their interests)
a decision was made for Rosa to proceed with a science fair project
on growing plants under various conditions. Rosa's Compactor, which
covered an entire semester, was updated in January. Her teacher
remarked that compacting her curriculum had actually saved him timetime
he would have spent correcting papers needlessly assigned! The value
of compacting for Rosa convinced him that he should continue the
process. The Compactor was also used as a vehicle for explaining
to Rosa's parents how specific modifications were being made to
accommodate her advanced language arts achievement level and her
interest in science. A copy of The Compactor was also passed on
to Rosa's sixth grade teacher, and a conference between the fifth
and sixth grade teachers and the resource teacher helped to ensure
continuity in dealing with Rosa's special needs.
Brad's Compactor. (Click
on the figure to see it as a PDF file.)
Brad Brad
displays strengths in language arts and mathematics. He attends
a large school which has the benefit of having a reading and math
consultant on the staff. Both of these consultants helped with the
pretesting administered to Brad and several other high potential
students from the fourth grade. Brad's Compactor was completed by
his classroom teacher who stapled the results of the pretest to
the form. This explains why column one is less detailed than in
other compacting examples.
Brad did regular curricular work in language
arts for only one or two days a week. In spelling, he was consistently
able to skip all of the drill and review work necessary to achieve
perfect scores on tests, and he used the time saved to pursue advanced
reading in the Great Books program.
In mathematics, he was able to master all
of his fourth grade curriculum in approximately two days each week.
Brad worked with three other students of similar ability in a cooperative
learning group (comprised of high ability math students who all
liked math) to be able to master math at this pace. The group then
selected alternatives listed in column three to pursue separately
or as a group during mathematics instruction time.
No gifted program existed in Brad's district,
so his classroom teacher had to work much harder to provide appropriate
instruction and alternatives for column three. However, assistance
was provided by the math and language-arts consultants who worked
with groups of either remedial or advanced students and who also
provided enrichment materials and appropriately advanced content
for targeted students. The media specialist directed the independent
study of students whose curriculum was compacted.
David's Compactor. (Click
on the figure to see it as a PDF file.)
David
David is a mathematically talented student
who is a sixth grader in a school district which has a policy against
vertical acceleration in mathematics. Many of the districts that have
participated in field tests of curriculum compacting have stated policies
that do not allow students to be accelerated past their chronological
grade level in any content area. Obviously, this is a dilemma for
talented students and their teachers.
In David's case, curriculum compacting resulted
in the completion of his math work for the entire year in the first
six weeks of school. His teacher decided to compact in this way
instead of having David work with his group one day each week for
the year. The teacher believed that this option worked in a more
efficient manner for his very organized, structured classroom. Also,
the identification of another student with abilities similar to
David's enabled David and her to work as learning partners throughout
the year.
The classroom teacher selected various mathematics
enrichment activities, as described in the district's math curriculum
guide for David's grade. He also selected several math alternative
enrichment activities for David's work in the classroom. David also
spent two hours a week of his mathematics instructional time in
the gifted and talented program resource room with a teacher who
further enriched his math program with computer skills.
|