 |
We
asked the teachers involved in one of our research studies on compacting
if they would continue to use curriculum compacting in the future,
and why they would make this decision. The responses to this were
very positive. More than two thirds of all teachers indicated that
they would continue to use the curriculum compacting procedure in
the future, and most of those who responded positively wrote comments
about their experiences when using this procedure. A few of these
comments follow.
Yes. I feel their time can
be better spent than doing assignments on material they already
know. When they share projects and reports with the class, it also
enriches their [other students'] learning experiences.
Yes, I will continue this method because
it has shown me a very meaningful strategy to use with students
who already know grade level material. In turn this enables students
to become interested in independent learning they would like to
pursue. The capable students are less likely to be turned off
by this approach. This was a strategy that kept all students challenged
in my class. I will use this next year in math and hopefully other
areas as well.
Definitely! This is such an exciting way
to teach! I feel the students involved in the compacting program
had the opportunity to become such active, independent learners.
They had a taste of learning through their own actions not just
the material spooned out through limited textbooks. It was amazing
to watch this learning process in action! Sparks flew in my classroom
this year!!! Now that I'm familiar with the program, I can't wait
for next year to begin!
The vast majority of teachers, we studied
were able to implement curriculum compacting for the student(s)
they selected. We found, however, that many experienced some frustration
over a lack of expertise in knowing what to substitute for high
ability students, the limited time they had to plan to meet individual
differences, and the logistics of teaching different topics to different
groups of students. Some also indicated the lack of support staff
needed to implement replacement activities (reading and math specialists,
gifted and talented program staff), and other concerns relating
to classroom management. While curriculum compacting is a viable
process for meeting the needs of high ability students in the regular
classroom, it clearly takes time, effort, and planning on the part
of classroom teachers.
A substantial number of teachers involved
in the study indicated that they were able to extend curriculum
compacting to other students, many of whom were not identified and
involved in the gifted program. This finding may indicate the usefulness
of extending the types of gifted education pedagogy often reserved
for high ability students to a larger segment of the population,
as has been previously suggested by researchers (Renzulli & Reis,
1991). The follow-up study indicated interesting trends about the
continued use of compacting, especially about how the process could
be implemented in schools with the support of a principal or someone
to coach teachers. These practices included:
- assisting classroom teachers to incorporate
compacting into their yearly goals
- encouraging the use of compacting in only
one area or with only a few students
- reserving special time at selected faculty
meetings to discuss progress with the compacting process
- exchanging ideas on teachers' use of the
compacting strategy to share and "piggy-back" on each others'
ideas
Advice From Successful Teachers About Compacting
In particular, teachers who participated
indicated that teachers who were most successful in compacting used
the following strategies to create an ecology of success.
- First, they worked with a colleague
or colleagues with whom they shared a common bond. They wanted
to improve their teaching practices and were not afraid to ask
each other for help or support.
- Second, they started with a
small group of students and not their entire class. The successful
teachers understood that this process would take some time and
organization and became committed to trying to work with a group
who really needed the process first. By not trying this with all
students, they reduced the stress and challenges they would have
encountered if they tried to do too much in the beginning of the
process.
- Third, they asked for help
from their liaisons, the district content consultants and each
other. In each successful district, teachers asked each other
how they were handling pretesting and assessment. They shared
strategies for management and for replacement, and visited each
other's classrooms at their own suggestions or because a liaison
suggested it.
- Fourth, they understood that like
a novice practicing piano scales, they would continue to improve
by trying and reflecting on their work in this area. By reflecting
on what had worked, they were able to modify and change their
own attempts, and consistently improve.
If teachers are provided with appropriate
support for compacting, they will eventually incorporate this practice
into their classroom repertoire for other than identified gifted
students. More importantly, they reported that the benefits to all
students certainly make the effort worthwhile. One teacher's evaluative
comment about the compacting process reflects the attitude of most
teachers who participated in our research study.
"As soon as I saw how enthusiastic and
receptive my students were about the compacting process, I began
to become more committed to implementing this method in all my classes."
|
|