Journal
for the Education of the Gifted
Summer 2000, Volume 23, Number 4 Abstracts
Approach
and Avoidance Motivation as Predictors of Achievement Behavior in Physics
Instructions Among Mildly and Highly Gifted Eighth-Grade Students
Albert Ziegler & Kurt A. Heller
An
investigation was undertaken to test the predictive power of motivational
variables in introductory physics courses completed at German college
preparatory high schools. Dependent variables consisted of achievement
assessments, self-perceptions of competence, motivational variables, and
intended electives. Achievement differences were influenced by the talent
variable; no significant influence could be registered for approach motivation
or avoidance motivation. In contrast, approach motivation did have a positive
influence on self-perceptions of competence and intended elective choices,
however, and not on the motivational factors.
Gender
Differences in Academic Attitudes Among Gifted Elementary School Students
Mary Ann Swiatek & Ann Lupkowski-Shoplik
A
number of studies have documented gender differences in the academic attitudes
of gifted adolescents, but few studies have investigated these differences among
students younger than age 12. Very few studies explore the age at which the
differences emerge. The present study investigated four questions: Are gender
differences in attitudes toward academic subjects evident among gifted 3rd
through 6th graders? Do the students’ attitudes toward school subjects vary
according to grade level? Do gender differences become more or less pronounced
from 3rd to 6th grade? Are attitudes toward academic areas related to
students’ ability in those areas? To address these questions, 2,089 gifted
3rd- through 6th-grade children rated their liking for 11 academic areas.
Observed gender differences were consistent with those found in research with
older students participating in talent-search programs. Grade-level differences
suggest that attitudes toward several academic areas become more negative with
age. Attitudes were not related to tested academic ability.
An
Evaluation of Alternative Screening Procedures
Carol
Reid, Brenda Romanoff, Bob Algozzine, & Ann Udall
Disproportional
minority membership in special programs has become a major issue in gifted
education programs. Identifying students who are gifted has traditionally been
grounded in criteria emphasizing unitary measures of intellectual ability. An
alternative perspective with promise for addressing concerns related to
disproportion and bias in placement practices has emerged from the theory of
multiple intelligences (MI; Gardner, 1983, 1993). While perspectives and
opinions regarding multiple intelligences are plentiful, research on the
effectiveness of assessment and instructional practices grounded in MI theory
has been sparse. This research was designed to shed light on the problem-solving
assessment (PSA) procedure, an application of MI theory focused on
identification of students for gifted education programs. Scores and decisions
grounded in PSA and more traditional criteria were described, compared, and
analyzed. As in previous research, positive correlations were evident among
scores for different types of intelligences and applications of another
identification criterion. More important, different groups of students were
identified when using each approach; a more diverse population was identified
with the problem-solving-assessment procedure.
Creating
Culturally Responsive Classrooms for Gifted African American Students
Donna
Y. Ford, Tyrone C. Howard, J. John Harris, III, & Cynthia A. Tyson
The
need to more effectively teach and meet the needs of culturally, racially, and
linguistically diverse students occupies a great deal of attention in the field
of education. In gifted education,
much of the discussion centers on the underrepresentation of diverse students in
programs and services for gifted students, with a growing body of work focusing
on issues of underachievement among these students. In this article, we contend that one solution to these two
issues is for schools to create culturally responsive classrooms.
We describe the needs of diverse students, give several rationales for
creating culturally responsive classrooms, and provide recommendations for
creating classrooms that affirm diverse students.