epsy341small.gif (20859 bytes)
The purpose of this unit is to explore the validity and reliability of instruments. You will complete two reliability projects for this unit. Please read all of the instructor notes on reliability and validity,

"The quality of the instruments used in research is very important, for the conclusions researchers draw are based on the information they obtain using these instruments....[It is imperative that] the inferences they draw, based on the data they collect, are valid. Validity refers to the appropriateness, meaningfulness, and usefulness of the inferences a researcher makes. Reliability refers to the consistency of scores or answers from one administration or an instrument to another, and from one set of items to another" (Fraenkel & Wallen, 2000, p. 169). 

First, learn about reliability and then learn about validity.

As a point of interest...
If a researcher were to develop an instrument to measure students' attitudes, the following steps would be taken:

Beginning Steps in Developing an Attitude Instrument

  1. Review literature in the domain which you wish to measure (i.e., "computer attitudes").
  2. Develop a list of categories (subscales) that you wish to sample from the domain. The domain may be "Computer Attitudes" and the categories may be "ease of use of computers" and "usefulness in education".
  3. Write 8 to 10 items/statements (operational definitions) for each category (i.e., "Computers will help students learn material faster.").
  4. Give the items to at least 5 experts for classification (Content Validity). The panel of experts will attempt to match the operational definitions with their appropriate categories within the domain.
  5. Develop an instrument with the successfully classified items. Use a Likert scale to design your instrument. You will rewrite the items that were not successfully classified.
  6. Field test the instrument (6 to 10 people per item on the instrument) with the populations for which the instrument is being developed.
  7. Run a factor analysis (exploratory) on the field test responses. More advanced students may wish to do a confirmatory factory analysis.
  8. Name each factor (category) based on the items which loaded on it (>.40)
  9. Review whether each item conceptually belongs with its factor (subscale) and remove those which do not.
  10. Run Cronbach's Alpha Reliability for each factor/category (subscale) to investigate internal consistency reliability.
  11. Modify and retest the instrument if necessary (We want alpha>.70 for an attitude instrument).